You are hereBlogs / bmann's blog / BarCamp Vancouver 2009 wrapped
BarCamp Vancouver 2009 wrapped
So, that's a wrap: BarCamp Vancouver 2009 is "in the can". I really enjoyed this year's event -- I even went to and gave some sessions! (yes, that's worthy of note - as an organizer, it can be hard to relax and get into the flow)
I attended a great talk by Dustin Sacks on the 10 principles of Burning Man and how they compare / contrast with BarCamp. It was great, and made me think about a ton of things.
One thing that stood out for me is that I think that BarCamp has "moved on" from its original core focus on making code -- in part because of the principle of "radical inclusion". We kept making it more inclusive until lots of people that weren't at the same "level" started coming (in tech, in background, etc. etc.). It's not a problem, per se, it's just evolution.
I used the phrase "Know when to fork" in a later session: and a bunch of local tech "makers" have done just that, with BazCamp Vancouver. Looks like it will be in early November - I'm looking forward to it, and I'm definitely going to have to follow up on the @MakerBot angle (blog post asking for "expressions of interest" forthcoming).
In any case, thanks to Dustin for leading this - I know we could have spent more time diving into these topics in even more depth. I definitely want to explore / focus / highlight some of these principles in future events. Gifting, civic responsibility, radical self-reliance -- all seem to resonate highly.
Passion and Frustration
I was further moved when Mark Busse pulled me into running a session with him on Balancing Frustration and Passion. The session took a lot out of me, as it is a line that I walk *all the time*. We ended up in all sorts of interesting places - many of which were themselves frustrating! :P Mark is an incredible person, and I really enjoyed tossing discussion points back and forth with him and other participants.
I think passion and frustration are two sides of the same coin. It's funny, but I've often told people - I bitch because I care. If I send you 18 usability issues with your website (frustration) it means that I care (passion). If I didn't care, I wouldn't bother writing up the email and sending it to you.
My main recommendation for tackling any project - that is, actually deciding that you will work on it - is that you ideally need to recruit a total of three people. Yourself, plus two others. With only two, each person needs to be aware of all the details in case the other person needs to take a break / gets run over by a bus / whatever. With three, the load is spread a bit more easily. Of course, if you're high on passion, you'll just go ahead all by yourself, but it's something to keep in mind for longer term / larger projects.
Co Working
Right after the "Passion" session was the co-working session. It ended up being mainly an information sharing and level set session, but judging from the amount of different initiatives we heard about, it was a necessary first step.
I started by talking a bit about WorkSpace closing down - the exact details aren't clear, but ultimately it wasn't financially sustainable as a for profit business. Then I covered the planning / idea stage that the Bootup Entrepreneurial Society is at - we'd love to solve the pain of flexible space for software startups, and to provide a core gathering space for entrepreneurs in the downtown core.
I had just met @NickMolnar the week before and compared a few notes, and invited him to participate as well. He is looking into building a commercial hack/maker/builder space. Nick wrote up a post on what he's thinking / planning. I think some of the existing Vancouver Hack Space folks got a bit miffed by Nick being new to the scene / misappropriating the term "hackerspace". I believe Nick's focus is perhaps similar to Tech Shop - which has a strong commercial component. Of course, VHS is growing as well, so this could concievably be something that existed "next door" to each other.
Next, we heard from Irwin a bit about the W2 Community Media Arts organization / space that is going into the Woodwards complex. If you want to volunteer, there is a Volunteer Meet and Greet tomorrow.
I would really liked to have gotten into some more needs and wants of individuals of potential spaces, but we ran out of time - hopefully we'll get to some of that in further face to face meetings, as well as via survey as described below.
The two main next steps are:
1) re-factoring and extending the notes on the wiki (thanks to Raul for liveblogging).
In particular, I'd like to see each initiative listed there with mission, capacity, cost, and current needs. For example, Irwin of W2 will have incubator space targeted at social enterprise - his example was getting an aboriginal film festival off the ground. This would need to be captured as part of the mission / goal of each space. The needs section is also supremely important. For example, the Bootup Society currently needs space and funding. The Network Hub is currently full, so their needs might also include "more space". If we can get a good overview of shared goals and needs, then we know where we can work together, and where we need to apply the principle of "know when to fork".
This might be a useful jumping off point for also listing spaces that are available for community meetups of various kinds - both James of Kontent Creative and Mark of Industrial Brand spoke up, offering space for ~30 people. The Society has a Vancouver Venues page / Google Spreadsheet that might be extended.
2) run a survey gathering information from people interested in co-working / shared office space / community space / incubator space etc. etc.
This is the main action item that I am taking on. I have a draft survey, which I will post to the BarCamp wiki. I would like to get everyone's input on what questions need to be included, and then we can ideally send this survey out once, to the broadest number of people, to get lots of useful information and feedback to help guide everyone's decision making process.
(Turns out Roland recorded the session, too)
Next Steps
The rest of the day is a bit of a blur. There are lots of sessions that overlapped and I'm sorry to have missed (esp. the Design Charette by @awesome). Lunch was good (we even had snacks in the morning, when all I thought we had was coffee). I think the space worked great, and I hope that Discovery Parks Vancouver gets a bunch of inquiries out of it (here's a direct link to the commercialization centre PDF). Vancouver Open Data was great. Clean up was quick. Yes, I'm fading here in the middle of the night. Go look here and there and you'll find more wrap ups a plenty.
What's next? Well, the organizers will send a wrapup email - please add links to upcoming events, much as we discussed verbally in the wrap up session. We'll also be meeting to debrief about the event. After the debrief, we'll be doing a "call for 2010 organizers".
If you haven't already, please continuing blogging, tweeting, uploading, tagging, wiki-ing and otherwise documenting the event. There is a long list of links right on the front page of talks with lots of links, so please continue to flesh them out. As well, if you have a blog post about the event you want to highlight, please start a new section on the front page - something like "Related Blog Posts".
Most importantly: take action. Documenting and sharing the knowledge is one thing, but the next is to take actions. I know I have a ton of follow ups to do, and I hope you all do as well.
Thanks to everyone for attending - and most importantly, participating. And a final note: be excellent to each other.


Thanks for the wrap-up post Boris - I had a great time at BarCamp this year, and I think it was an *incredibly* good deal @ $20 for a great day with some very interesting people, a shirt and lots of good food!
I do enjoy the eclectic mix of social networking + social activism, photography, business strategy, UI design, Day trading (?!), etc. talks at BarCamp, and I was really impressed at the mix of people and interests this year. As a developer though, I would *love* to see more technical talks at BarCamp. BazCamp sounds interesting but to me sounds more hardware then software, and I'd prefer to see tech talks rolled in with all the BarCamp goodness then to fork the community.
I do wonder if a big part of the reason for the lack of technical talks is the difficulty in putting *on* an interesting, relevant and practical technical talk. Many of the tech talks I've seen at Barcamp and the "Open Web" ex. "Vancouver PHP" Conference are either way too code heavy and dry, or just too general and hard to apply. My one attempt at a tech talk in the past was pretty painful, so I know how hard (i.e. how much work) it is to get it right.
I think the 2Paths talk on Linked Data and their work with the OECD, World Bank and US Census Bureau was a good example of a tech (lite) talk with a good mix of interesting problem, interesting tech, interesting solution interesting discussion and an actual piece of software to show off (sadly not open source until 2011). It does strike me that the talk was put together for an "official" (read: getting the bills paid) presentation and thus the incentive to spend a lot of time polishing it was very high. :)
I wonder if there is a way before the next BarCamp to encourage people to put together tech talks. IMHO, *the* most effective way to encourage people is to reassure them that people really *are* interested in what they are going to talk about and that they will *be* there for the presentation to contribute to the energy and discussion. Nobody wants to put a lot of energy into a talk if 10 people show up and there's no discussion afterward (at least I sure don't want to).
Perhaps just a call for talks on particular topics? Maybe with some sort of tagging to help organize talks into streams on the morning of the event?
Thanks for the wrapup post Boris. This is the first year I haven't been able to make it to barcamp so it's nice to read some of these things.
"One thing that stood out for me is that I think that BarCamp has "moved on" from its original core focus on making code -- in part because of the principle of "radical inclusion"."
I've been to barcamps in Vancouver since 2006 and I don't recall them ever being focused on making code. The most technical sessions I can recall were relating to identity and the semantic web. But I think the majority of the sessions have always revolved around photography, blogging, social web, and business type stuff in the past.
I've been to BarCamps all over the world. Many of them are more technical, especially since use of online tools by less technical people is farther behind in, for example, Europe.
Also, we've BUILT a ton of base tools - you can get cloud computing from Amazon, and you can do a "mashup" site in 5 minutes using Drupal and Google Maps (see http://water.tylorsherman.com).
So, you may be right for Vancouver, but again, that's a matter of the participants. It bugs me that I might have to personally invite people to give technical presentations if I want to see them.
...thanks for the BazCamp plug! Should be some good times with robots!
Great wrap-up... wish I could have caught some of BarCamp this year (but had to deal with some unexpected stuff at home).
Regarding the VHS kafuffle with Nick, I'd chalk it up to the ability of non-face-to-face mediums to faciliate drama (and my own lack of judgement in knowing when and what to communicate where). In a blog post the day of BarCamp, Nick states that Vancouver needs a "movement" to establish a "world-class" hacker lab, but didn't mention VHS's work (the founding members have been working for over a year bootstrapping a hack space) which I thought was weird at the time as Nick is aware of VHS's existence.
Anyways, I talked to Nick via Twitter and he assured me it was an oversight he'd correct, which seemed fine to me. I passed on my communication to other VHS folk a VHS member made some off-the-cuff remarks that, after some internal discussion, he apologized for.
In a nutshell, VHS is open to working with Nick in the future if it makes sense and I've learned the lesson that some community intel is best shared face to face rather than via the intertubes.
The minor drama spurred some good conversation between VHS members and consensus seems to be that we want to focus on cranking up the awesome with our own efforts rather than giving other community efforts a hard time.
It was a great sesssion, Boris - and I enjoyed it enormously.
Cheers,
R.