Open source

I like to tell people about my Three Definitions of Open Source as context.

I’m interested in Commons Funding and Open Source Licensing, but most especially Commons Based Peer Production: how to work together to produce and maintain things.

Open source code and related open data goods are very common, but peer production and co-op structures can and should be applied to many more things.

The missions and meanings of open source for me have very much been superseded by DWeb principles: the licensing of software is only a small part of that.

Related notes:

• 11ty second brain
• Affero General Public License (AGPL)
• Bdfl
• Business Source LIcense
• Backyourstack
• Cal.com
• Chad whitacre
• Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm
• Commercial open source software
• David luecke
• Dokku
• Dokploy
• Drupal
• Feathersjs
• Freescout
• Hedgedoc
• History of open source in vancouver
• Initiative on sponsorship forwarding
• Knowledge networks and the politics of protocols
• La suite
• Linkding
• Nlnet
• Osi Approved open source
• Open Source Initiative
• Open collective
• Open protocols are better than open source
• Open Source Beyond Licensing - The Evolution Ahead
• Open source definition
• Open source licensing
• Open source sred platform
• Open source is a restaurant
• Open sourcing kinopio
• Open source is no longer a radical act
• Orbit model
• Out of your element
• Oxide Computer
• Paying people to work on open source is good actually
• Pears
• Pinokio
• Polar
• Self Hosting
• Software commons
• Superbloom
• Tangara
• Third wave (commercial) open source
• Three definitions of open source
• Towards software commons
• Ubicloud
• Ventoy
• Beets
• Gdown
• Open source as a job
• P2panda